That’s a natural reaction because this exact scenario has occurred in the past with other software.īut did Autodesk really do that? It turns out no, the limitations they imposed on the personal use license were actually reasonable: the features clipped off were almost all used only by advanced users who really shouldn’t be living on a free license. They fear they will be forced into paying for a license to use something they previously had at no charge. When a company announces a change of this nature, the immediate reaction among users of a free plan is fear and possibly anger. The intent of Autodesk’s personal use license is exactly that: for a person.
Things like team functions, for example, are not possible, and that makes sense: if hobbyists are building projects that require multiple team members, perhaps they should be using a paid version. This evaluation caused them to trim off certain advanced features from the free version.
They seem to have made an evaluation of how hobbyists and personal users would normally use the software. Evidently they felt there was some abuse of the license occurring amongst participants and sought to tighten things up. You’ll recall that Autodesk made some significant changes to the free “personal use” license for their popular 3D modeling system, Fusion 360. What reactions have occurred? Autodesk Fusion 360 Personal Use License Changes It’s been several days since Autodesk announced big changes to their Fusion 360 Personal licensing program.
0 kommentar(er)
